[99711] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Adrian Chadd)
Tue Oct 2 23:58:02 2007
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 11:54:37 +0800
From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@creative.net.au>
To: John Curran <jcurran@mail.com>
Cc: Nanog <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <p06240800c328ac093eff@[192.168.8.69]>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007, John Curran wrote:
> We're likely going to have to agree to disagree on the impacts
> of a "market", as you see an "additional O(1M) routes" being
> the total impact (over the remaining lifetime of IPv4!), whereas
> I see no such limit on additional routes with balkanization as
> the inevitable result.
Has anyone modelled the behaviour of current equipment in a world with 1
million ipv6 table entries? Heck, what about a world with 500,000 ipv6
entries and a BGP announcement churn rate along GIH's prediction curve?
Adrian
