[99649] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (John Curran)
Mon Oct 1 12:18:10 2007
In-Reply-To: <20071001135502.GF28613@catpipe.net>
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 12:15:26 -0400
To: Phil Regnauld <regnauld@catpipe.net>
From: John Curran <jcurran@mail.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
At 3:55 PM +0200 10/1/07, Phil Regnauld wrote:
>
> I don't think you need government taxing for that. I think
> that the IPv4 trading market we're about to see appear
> will resolve that issue very quickly. Either you can afford it, or
> you can't.
What happens if folks can somehow obtain IPv4 address blocks
but the cumulative route load from all of these non-hierarchical
blocks prevents ISP's from routing them?
/John
