[99647] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Phil Regnauld)
Mon Oct 1 10:28:52 2007
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 15:55:02 +0200
From: Phil Regnauld <regnauld@catpipe.net>
To: Leigh Porter <leigh.porter@ukbroadband.com>
Cc: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>, nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <4700F484.3070003@ukbroadband.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
Leigh Porter (leigh.porter) writes:
>
>
> So the governments should tax all new IPv4 only equipment and tax IPv4
> Internet connectivity so that it does cost more to use v4 and then
> people will start using v6.
I don't think you need government taxing for that. I think
that the IPv4 trading market we're about to see appear
will resolve that issue very quickly. Either you can afford it, or
you can't.
