[99668] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (David Conrad)
Tue Oct 2 08:59:06 2007
In-Reply-To: <p06240806c326ca3f65bb@[192.168.4.143]>
Cc: Nanog <nanog@nanog.org>
From: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 05:39:02 -0700
To: John Curran <jcurran@mail.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
John,
On Oct 1, 2007, at 9:15 AM, John Curran wrote:
> At 3:55 PM +0200 10/1/07, Phil Regnauld wrote:
>>
>> I don't think you need government taxing for that. I think
>> that the IPv4 trading market we're about to see appear
>> will resolve that issue very quickly. Either you can afford it, or
>> you can't.
>
> What happens if folks can somehow obtain IPv4 address blocks
> but the cumulative route load from all of these non-hierarchical
> blocks prevents ISP's from routing them?
Presumably, the folks with the non-hierarchical address space that
might get filtered would have potentially limited connectivity (as
opposed to no connectivity if they didn't have IPv4 addresses).
Regards,
-drc
