[99554] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6)

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jari Arkko)
Fri Sep 28 00:52:36 2007

Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 07:26:46 +0300
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
CC: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <46FC1FB3.3020406@psg.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu


Randy,

> with all due respect, jari; maybe the number of groups is neither the
> problem nor the solution
>
> too much energy has been and is still being wasted dealing with overly
> cute/complex ideas these wgs invent to fancy up ipv6 so it will be
> deployed; from tla/nla/... to ula to sham6.  this has prevented focusing
> on the real problems of deployment so they can be solved.
>   

I know this very well. But I'm listening. We are already trying
to do something about nat-pt. What else would you see as
a priority?

Jari


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post