[99555] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Randy Bush)
Fri Sep 28 00:55:01 2007
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 18:32:29 -1000
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
CC: Alain Durand <alain_durand@cable.comcast.com>, nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <46FC8227.4010406@piuha.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
>> o nat-pt with standardized algs for at least dns, smtp, http, sip,
>> and rtp -->> This is on my top 3 hot topics. And make it works both
>> way, v4 to v6 and v6 to v4. And also don’t call it NAT-PT. That
>> name is dead.
> For what it is worth, this is one of the things that I want to do.
i took you at your word the other month, so stopped worrying about
motivating it. as far as getting it through the ivtf, well, that ain't
my job any more. i gave at the office. thank you for accepting the burden.
> I don't want to give you an impression that NAT-PT++ will solve all
> the IPv6 transition issues
heck no. but it will enable folk to have v6-almost-only (except for one
ipv4 address) sites in a dual stack and mostly v4 world. it will allow
end site transition.
randy
