[99553] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jari Arkko)
Fri Sep 28 00:48:57 2007
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 07:25:11 +0300
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
To: Alain Durand <alain_durand@cable.comcast.com>
CC: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>, nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <C321CF0F.330C%alain_durand@cable.comcast.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
Randy, Alain,
>
> o nat-pt with standardized algs for at least dns, smtp, http, sip, and
> rtp
>
>
> -->> This is on my top 3 hot topics. And make it works both way, v4 to
> v6 and v6 to v4.
> And also don’t call it NAT-PT. That name is dead.
For what it is worth, this is one of the things that I want
to do. I don't want to give you an impression that NAT-PT++
will solve all the IPv6 transition issues; I suspect dual stack
is a better answer. But nevertheless, the IETF needs to
produce a revised spec for the translation case. Fred and
I are organizing an effort to do this.
Jari
