[97336] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Network Level Content Blocking (UK) for people who cant be bothered
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Leigh Porter)
Fri Jun 8 05:44:46 2007
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2007 10:43:46 +0100
From: Leigh Porter <leigh.porter@ukbroadband.com>
To: Alexander Harrowell <a.harrowell@gmail.com>
Cc: Sean Donelan <sean@donelan.com>,
"Chris L. Morrow" <christopher.morrow@verizonbusiness.com>,
nanog <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <a2b2d0480706080127q7f6794efxa9c8fc6a02835b35@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
Alexander Harrowell wrote:
> On 6/7/07, Leigh Porter <leigh.porter@ukbroadband.com> wrote:
>>
>> Since only port 80 is passed through the filter then of course there are
>> all manor of things you could do to circumvent the filter and this will
>> of course always be the case as people will use whatever they can to get
>> what they want. After all, all yuo really need to do in order to get all
>> the dodgy material you want is to subscribe to a decent USENET service
>> and get it all from that.
>>
>> For what it's worth though it works well for what it is and we certainly
>> get a few hits on it.
>>
>
> Have you been asked by the Dibble for the squid's server log yet? It's
> the obvious next step - if you had a URL request blocked, obviously
> you were where you shouldn't have been. You're either with us...or
> you're with the terrorists.
I actually removed the code in Squid that logs so it's impossible to log
without significant development work ;-)
--
Leigh Porter
