[97338] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Network Level Content Blocking (UK) for people who cant be bothered
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (David Freedman)
Fri Jun 8 06:56:52 2007
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2007 11:05:37 +0100
From: David Freedman <david.freedman@uk.clara.net>
To: Leigh Porter <leigh.porter@ukbroadband.com>
Cc: Alexander Harrowell <a.harrowell@gmail.com>,
Sean Donelan <sean@donelan.com>,
"Chris L. Morrow" <christopher.morrow@verizonbusiness.com>,
nanog <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <466924D2.7060708@ukbroadband.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
Its too late, you've already admitted that the data exists and can be
captured.
This is always where it starts...
Dave.
Leigh Porter wrote:
>
> Alexander Harrowell wrote:
>
>> On 6/7/07, Leigh Porter <leigh.porter@ukbroadband.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Since only port 80 is passed through the filter then of course there are
>>> all manor of things you could do to circumvent the filter and this will
>>> of course always be the case as people will use whatever they can to get
>>> what they want. After all, all yuo really need to do in order to get all
>>> the dodgy material you want is to subscribe to a decent USENET service
>>> and get it all from that.
>>>
>>> For what it's worth though it works well for what it is and we certainly
>>> get a few hits on it.
>>>
>>
>> Have you been asked by the Dibble for the squid's server log yet? It's
>> the obvious next step - if you had a URL request blocked, obviously
>> you were where you shouldn't have been. You're either with us...or
>> you're with the terrorists.
>
>
> I actually removed the code in Squid that logs so it's impossible to log
> without significant development work ;-)
>
> --
> Leigh Porter
>
>
