[97335] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Network Level Content Blocking (UK) for people who cant be bothered to read the article..
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Alexander Harrowell)
Fri Jun 8 05:17:20 2007
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 09:27:00 +0100
From: "Alexander Harrowell" <a.harrowell@gmail.com>
To: "Leigh Porter" <leigh.porter@ukbroadband.com>
Cc: "Sean Donelan" <sean@donelan.com>,
"Chris L. Morrow" <christopher.morrow@verizonbusiness.com>,
nanog <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <4668584A.7050108@ukbroadband.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
On 6/7/07, Leigh Porter <leigh.porter@ukbroadband.com> wrote:
>
> Since only port 80 is passed through the filter then of course there are
> all manor of things you could do to circumvent the filter and this will
> of course always be the case as people will use whatever they can to get
> what they want. After all, all yuo really need to do in order to get all
> the dodgy material you want is to subscribe to a decent USENET service
> and get it all from that.
>
> For what it's worth though it works well for what it is and we certainly
> get a few hits on it.
>
Have you been asked by the Dibble for the squid's server log yet? It's
the obvious next step - if you had a URL request blocked, obviously
you were where you shouldn't have been. You're either with us...or
you're with the terrorists.
