[96440] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: ISP CALEA compliance
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mike Hammett)
Thu May 10 16:43:21 2007
From: "Mike Hammett" <nanog@ics-il.net>
To: <nanog@merit.edu>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 15:35:31 -0500
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
I believe its everything.
-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jason Frisvold" <xenophage0@gmail.com>
To: "Jared Mauch" <jared@puck.nether.net>
Cc: "Nikos Mouat" <nikm@cyberflunk.com>; <nanog@merit.edu>
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 1:03 PM
Subject: Re: ISP CALEA compliance
>
> On 5/10/07, Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net> wrote:
>> If you're not offering VoIP services, your life may be easier as
>> you will only need to intercept the data. Depending on your environment
>> you could do this with something like port-mirroring, or something
>> more advanced. There are a number of folks that offer TTP (Trusted
>> third-provider) services. Verisign comes to mind. But using a TTP
>> doesn't mean you can hide behind them. Compliance is ultimately your
>> (the company that gets the subponea) responsibility.
>
> Here's a question that's come up around here. Does a CALEA intercept
> include "hairpining" or is it *only* traffic leaving your network?
> I'm of the opinion that a CALEA intercept request includes every bit
> of traffic being sent or received by the targeted individual, but
> there is strong opposition here that thinks only internet-related
> traffic counts.
>
>> - Jared (IANAL!)
>
> --
> Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold
> XenoPhage0@gmail.com
> http://blog.godshell.com
>
