[96441] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: ISP CALEA compliance
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mike Hammett)
Thu May 10 16:49:18 2007
From: "Mike Hammett" <nanog@ics-il.net>
To: <nanog@merit.edu>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 15:35:50 -0500
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
I recommend Kris Twomey... lokt.net
-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "David E. Smith" <dave@mvn.net>
To: <nanog@merit.edu>
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 11:36 AM
Subject: Re: ISP CALEA compliance
>
> Nikos Mouat wrote:
>
>> I have interpretted CALEA to apply only to providers of VOICE service,
>> be it VOIP or traditional, however I was told this morning point blank
>> by the FCC that CALEA most definitely applies to all ISPs that provide
>> internet access at speeds over 200k.
>
> That, and the definition of ISP, are still a bit fuzzy...
>
> wireless@wispa.org, for instance, has had a LOT of chatter about that,
> but WISPA's staff attorney believes that small wireless ISPs are
> required to be CALEA-compliant. (WISPA is a trade association for
> wireless ISPs.) If small ISPs have to be compliant, it's probably safe
> to assume big ISPs are too. :)
>
> http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ is the list archive - there's
> a lot of noise in there, but a fair amount of signal (start in February
> 2007 or so, and work your way up). There's also forms you're apparently
> supposed to fill out (FCC Form 445, and a CALEA compliance plan due next
> week).
>
> As always your friendly attorney knows better than I do.
>
> David Smith
> MVN.net
>
