[89175] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: shim6 @ NANOG (forwarded note from John Payne)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Kurt Erik Lindqvist)
Sat Mar 4 10:20:30 2006
In-Reply-To: <2A55DC37-2294-4FFF-B859-8C0ACC8EA3E8@multicasttech.com>
Cc: Joe Abley <jabley@isc.org>, John Payne <john@sackheads.org>,
Christian Kuhtz <kuhtzch@corp.earthlink.net>,
Daniel Golding <dgolding@burtongroup.com>,
Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>,
NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
From: Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>
Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2006 13:59:18 +0100
To: Marshall Eubanks <tme@multicasttech.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
On 3 mar 2006, at 04.13, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
> I would be surprised if Shim6 going into actual deployed boxes was
> any faster. So, if Shim6 was finalized today, which it won't be,
> in 2010 we might have 70% deployment and in 2012 we might have 90%
> deployment.
OTOH Teredo, which isn't even a standard is in more or less all
Windows XP boxes....
- kurtis -
