[89174] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: 2005-1, good or bad? [Was: Re: Shim6 vs PI addressing]
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Kurt Erik Lindqvist)
Sat Mar 4 10:16:56 2006
In-Reply-To: <3C5AAD9B-3DCB-4502-858A-7529EDFE2BA8@multicasttech.com>
Cc: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>,
Andre Oppermann <nanog-list@nrg4u.com>,
Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>, Jeroen Massar <jeroen@unfix.org>,
David Barak <thegameiam@yahoo.com>, Joe Abley <jabley@isc.org>,
NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
From: Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>
Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2006 13:37:59 +0100
To: Marshall Eubanks <tme@multicasttech.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
On 3 mar 2006, at 04.54, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
>
>> Finallly, allow me to observe that deciding on this issues
>> regionally while the resulting routes must be carried world wide
>> doesn't make sense. We really need a global forum for this.
>
> I fully agree here. Maybe a meeting should be organized in the fall
> of 2006 or early 2007 to discuss this,
> either under the auspices of the NRO (http://www.nro.net) or
> independently.
Problem is that there simply is not one-size fits all when it comes
to allocation policies. Besides that, AFAIK the NRO have no policy
role at all - by design. Policy is set my open meetings at each of
the RIRs.
- kurtis -
