[89176] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: absense of multicast deployment
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Kurt Erik Lindqvist)
Sat Mar 4 10:22:28 2006
In-Reply-To: <60F52961-4D9B-46BE-945D-F1C4C7D02846@multicasttech.com>
Cc: Joe Abley <jabley@isc.org>, Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org>,
"Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>,
"North American Noise and Off-topic Gripes" <nanog@merit.edu>
From: Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>
Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2006 13:42:40 +0100
To: Marshall Eubanks <tme@multicasttech.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
On 3 mar 2006, at 22.02, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
> By any measure, multicast deployment is much larger than IPv6
> deployment at present, and it is growing.
> I will be glad to argue the point to any length you might desire.
There are also operators that are deploying IPv6 just so that they
can do multicast to their end-users without have to figure out how to
run it through NAT. As was discussed at the last SANOG in some of the
workshops.
- kurtis -
