[89178] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: 2005-1, good or bad? [Was: Re: Shim6 vs PI addressing]
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Kurt Erik Lindqvist)
Sat Mar 4 10:27:21 2006
In-Reply-To: <440758C9.6080501@nrg4u.com>
Cc: Marshall Eubanks <tme@multicasttech.com>,
Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>, Jeroen Massar <jeroen@unfix.org>,
David Barak <thegameiam@yahoo.com>, Joe Abley <jabley@isc.org>,
NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
From: Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>
Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2006 13:35:02 +0100
To: Andre Oppermann <nanog-list@nrg4u.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
On 2 mar 2006, at 21.42, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> Putting routing decisions
> into the transport layer (4) as it is done or proposed with SCTP and
> SHIM6 is Total Evilness(tm) in my book.
Not that shim6 is a change to transport though, but a change at layer
3...
- kurtis -
