[88690] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: shim6 rides again (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (David Meyer)
Wed Feb 15 12:40:18 2006
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 09:39:20 -0800
From: David Meyer <dmm@1-4-5.net>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Cc: "Edward B. DREGER" <eddy+public+spam@noc.everquick.net>,
nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <17395.25687.387200.784198@roam.psg.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
--C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 11:26:47AM -0600, Randy Bush wrote:
>=20
> > Funny that shim6 is being mentioned. The corresponding open mic sessio=
n=20
> > at 35 showed how gathering people for 20 minutes of complaining can=20
> > effectively replace long, protracted email threads.
>=20
> and what was the effect in the ietf? zippo.
Agreed. And to be honest, I missed this in my notes from
35 (and the two sets of minutes that we had). While I
can't say authoratively, but I'm willing to wager that
the {MPLS, IPv6, <X>} WG didn't consider this as a
proposal. To that end, I'm happy to help write it up with
whomever wants to for Dallas (or whenever works).
More generally folks, let's solve this problem.
Dave
--C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFD82dIORgD1qCZ2KcRAiMHAJ0QZzjxyBK0/hmdegxJleFCFcQHjgCfQYQd
8eig9VYrlo7S3hnPhF1ikKo=
=Ancq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc--
