[88689] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: shim6 rides again (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Edward B. DREGER)
Wed Feb 15 12:36:58 2006
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 17:36:30 +0000 (GMT)
From: "Edward B. DREGER" <eddy+public+spam@noc.everquick.net>
To: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <17395.25687.387200.784198@roam.psg.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
RB> Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 11:26:47 -0600
RB> From: Randy Bush
RB> and what was the effect in the ietf? zippo.
Exactly. I'm claiming that the meeting was a more effective vehicle
than a mailing list for the group of people involved -- NANOGers. I'm
also suggesting that, by extension, cross-pollination between NANOG and
IETF meetings would be more efficient than simple forays onto "the
other mailing list" (with "other" defined by one's perspective).
Eddy
--
Everquick Internet - http://www.everquick.net/
A division of Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - http://www.brotsman.com/
Bandwidth, consulting, e-commerce, hosting, and network building
Phone: +1 785 865 5885 Lawrence and [inter]national
Phone: +1 316 794 8922 Wichita
________________________________________________________________________
DO NOT send mail to the following addresses:
davidc@brics.com -*- jfconmaapaq@intc.net -*- sam@everquick.net
Sending mail to spambait addresses is a great way to get blocked.
Ditto for broken OOO autoresponders and foolish AV software backscatter.
