[85824] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 news
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Paul Jakma)
Tue Oct 18 01:49:18 2005
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 06:51:00 +0100 (IST)
From: Paul Jakma <paul@clubi.ie>
To: Andre Oppermann <nanog-list@nrg4u.com>
Cc: Michael.Dillon@btradianz.com, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <4353904D.7020307@nrg4u.com>
Mail-Copies-To: paul@hibernia.jakma.org
Mail-Followup-To: paul@hibernia.jakma.org
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
On Mon, 17 Oct 2005, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> We all know how well carrier phone number routing and number
> portability works, don't we?
EWORKSFORME (and everyone else here). Took a good bit of very firm
pressure from ComReg, the telecoms wathdog/regulator here, to
overcome negative reaction from the operators though.
(There's no such pressure which could be applied on IP operators, but
same processes essentially could be applied at least for IP
connectivity at national regulatory levels at least - trade /32's at
INEX, the IX here and figure out billing. If only ComReg had the
authority.. ;) ).
regards,
--
Paul Jakma paul@clubi.ie paul@jakma.org Key ID: 64A2FF6A
Fortune:
"When people are least sure, they are often most dogmatic."
-- John Kenneth Galbraith
