[85870] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 news
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (John Dupuy)
Tue Oct 18 12:37:36 2005
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 11:37:06 -0500
To: Andre Oppermann <nanog-list@nrg4u.com>,
Paul Jakma <paul@clubi.ie>
From: John Dupuy <jdupuy-list@socket.net>
Cc: Michael.Dillon@btradianz.com, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <4354EC4C.8090603@nrg4u.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
At 07:36 AM 10/18/2005, Andre Oppermann wrote:
[... items deleted ...]
To summarize the differences between PSTN and Internet routing:
> o PSTN ports numbers only within regions/area codes
> o PSTN routes the return path along the forward path (symetric)
> o PSTN calls have pre-determined characteristics and performance (64kbit)
> o PSTN has static routing with periodic sync from porting database
> o PSTN pays the routing table lookup only once when doing call setup
> o PSTN call forwarding and peering is not free or zero settlement
>
>--
>Andre
Largely true; influenced by history and the difference between
circuit-switched networks and packet-switched networks. LNP is more like
DNS than multihoming. Sort of. Imagine TCP using domain names rather than
IP addresses.
I should note however, that in the U.S., Number Portability (LNP) rarely
uses call forwarding anymore. Except in legacy rural areas, the LNP dip
occurs before reaching the host office and is thus shunted to the correct
carrier earlier up in the stream. At minimum it is done by the N+1 switch.
However, it is common for the IXCs (LD Carriers) and CLECs do it even
earlier to avoid paying the local ILEC database lookup fees. In that
scenario, it routes perfectly to the correct carrier.
BTW, telephone networks are generally do not multihome and are very
fragile. Node (Switch) failure brings down large sections of the network.
They instead concentrate on 99.99%+ uptime for the switches themselves. In
other words, they concentrate on internal component redudancy and
same-destination route redundancy rather than handling an outage of the
entire switch. The SS7 network has removed some of this fragility, but not
all. Not by a long shot.
Describing this in a picture:
Internet way: "route around problems"
A - B - C
\ /
\-D-/
The Telco way: "try to make problems never happen"
A--B--C
A--B--C
Where the AA in the Telco model is essentially the same equipment in the
same room with redundant components.
Anyway, ... TCP using DNS rather than IP?... Interesting thought.
John
