[85823] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: And Now for Something Completely Different (was Re: IPv6 news)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Paul Jakma)
Tue Oct 18 01:42:33 2005
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 06:45:21 +0100 (IST)
From: Paul Jakma <paul@clubi.ie>
To: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0510171540470.24341@uplift.swm.pp.se>
Mail-Copies-To: paul@hibernia.jakma.org
Mail-Followup-To: paul@hibernia.jakma.org
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
On Mon, 17 Oct 2005, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> Also, if everybody got their equal size subnet delegation from each
> ISP then it shouldnt be that much of a problem to run two
> "networks" side-by-side by using the subnet part of the delegation
> equal to both networks, but keep the prefix separate. If you switch
> providers you change the prefix part. This means we need new
> mechanisms to handle this,
Hmm, one thing that would be nice would be to seperate the prefix
from the host identifier in DNS, oh... wait..
> but I feel that's better than doing the routing mistake again.
It's all routing, just shifting different portions of it to different
places.
regards,
--
Paul Jakma paul@clubi.ie paul@jakma.org Key ID: 64A2FF6A
Fortune:
panic ("Splunge!");
linux-2.2.16/drivers/scsi/psi240i.c
