[81415] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Outage queries and notices (was Re: GBLX congestion in Dallas area)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Henry Linneweh)
Wed Jun 8 23:04:42 2005
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 20:04:17 -0700 (PDT)
From: Henry Linneweh <hrlinneweh@sbcglobal.net>
To: Joel Perez <jperez@numind.net>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: 6667
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
I did notice A low number on the index at
http://www.internettrafficreport.com/namerica.htm
-Henry
--- Joel Perez <jperez@numind.net> wrote:
>
>
> [ SNIP ]
>
> >I think that these things are operational and
> belong here. Its'
> >the level that ras is talking about and the
> content. Saying
> >MCI has a massive fiber cut impacting 230 Congress
> IX vs.
> >GBLX is not doing what I demand are very different
> types of
> >outage posts.
>
> My original post to the list contained nothing about
> any services I
> expect with provider xxx. I asked if anybody else
> saw packet loss or
> congestion.
>
> My follow-up posts contained the reason as to why I
> was posting this to
> the list instead of to my provider, I then took it
> off-list with 2 other
> posters and managed to get more info out of them
> then out of GBLX. I try
> not to bash anybody because I know that doesn't
> really resolve anything
> most of the time.
>
>
> >I'd like to see the higher level stuff we used to
> do and have some
> >sort of information along with it vs. "i see a
> packet drop in XYZ".
> >A prefix or something. That usually makes people go
> look.
>
> I agree, it totally slipped my mind to provide that
> info. I just typed
> up a quick post and sent it out.
>
> Im my humble opinion I think this is Nanog content
> and that is why I
> posted it. Most posters opinion of what is and what
> isn't appropriate
> content varies. I love my delete key, if I don't
> think it's appropriate
> I delete it. No harm done to me.
>
> To each his own I guess.
>
> Thanks to those that responded.
>
>
