[81416] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Micorsoft's Sender ID Authentication......?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Suresh Ramasubramanian)
Wed Jun 8 23:09:37 2005
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 08:39:08 +0530
From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists@gmail.com>
Reply-To: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists@gmail.com>
To: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
Cc: "J.D. Falk" <jdfalk@cybernothing.org>, nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.60.0506081750380.11472@hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk>
Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu
On 08/06/05, Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> wrote:
>=20
> I don't think the lack of standard APIs is a problem: it seems to me that
> the various MTA authors have been reasonably keen to support the various
> nascent specifications, especially if they have a reasonably good
> reference implementation library.
>=20
Easier for those of us who run multiple MTAs, especially large farms of the=
m
But yes, you do have a point that it is not exactly a problem.
Is there something in the works for postfix and qmail yet?
regards
srs
--=20
Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists@gmail.com)
