[75639] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christian Kuhtz)
Fri Nov 19 12:51:08 2004
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 12:47:34 -0500
From: Christian Kuhtz <christian.kuhtz@BELLSOUTH.COM>
To: Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org>, Paul Vixie <paul@vix.com>,
North American Noise and Off-topic Gripes <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <068c01c4cdf2$58bfc8c0$6801a8c0@stephen>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On 11/18/04 11:38 PM, "Stephen Sprunk" <stephen@sprunk.org> wrote:
> I don't understand why exchanges would suffer; the real threat is that
> enterprises simply won't use IPv6 until IPv4 space is completely
> exhausted -- and perhaps even after it is.
It's not a threat, it's straightforward reality that business won't move
until there's a good reason to spend $. The threat to IPv6 is that the =
case
to spend $ is very thin and flimsy. Call it inertia, call it what you =
will,
but somebody has to authorize the dollars over spend on other needs.
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to =
which it is addressed and may contain confidential, proprietary, and/or =
privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other =
use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by =
persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If =
you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the =
material from all computers. 162
