[75640] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christian Kuhtz)
Fri Nov 19 12:54:12 2004
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 12:50:05 -0500
From: "Christian Kuhtz" <christian.kuhtz@BELLSOUTH.COM>
To: "Iljitsch van Beijnum" <iljitsch@muada.com>,
"Stephen Sprunk" <stephen@sprunk.org>
Cc: "North American Noise and Off-topic Gripes" <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <D48795CB-3A1E-11D9-992B-000A95CD987A@muada.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On 11/19/04 6:33 AM, "Iljitsch van Beijnum" <iljitsch@muada.com> wrote:
>=20
> On 19-nov-04, at 5:38, Stephen Sprunk wrote:
>=20
>> According to multi6, you will get PA space from each of your ISPs and
>> overlay a prefix from each on every subnet. I'll save y'all another
>> rant on the workability of that model...
>=20
>> Some fear that you would more likely just generate a ULA, use that
>> internally, and NAT at the borders.
>=20
> It isn't contrary to multi6 gospel to have the address swapping be =
done
> by boxes somewhere in the middle rather than have all hosts do it for
> themselves.
While that may or may not be gospel, why would the enterprise care to =
switch
to IPv6 in the first place?
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to =
which it is addressed and may contain confidential, proprietary, and/or =
privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other =
use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by =
persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If =
you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the =
material from all computers. 113
