[75624] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (J.A. Terranson)
Fri Nov 19 07:49:01 2004
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 06:48:21 -0600
From: "J.A. Terranson" <alif.terranson@gmail.com>
Reply-To: "J.A. Terranson" <alif.terranson@gmail.com>
To: NANOG list <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <1100590135.1408.48.camel@firenze.zurich.ibm.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 08:28:55 +0100, Jeroen Massar <jeroen@unfix.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-11-16 at 08:18 +0100, Kurt Erik Lindqvist wrote:
>
>
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> >
> > On 2004-11-16, at 02.24, Owen DeLong wrote:
> >
> > > ASNs issued today are subject to annual renewal. While this is a
> > > small charge and doesn't go up based on the number of ASNs, so, not
> > > 100% effective at reclaiming all unused resources, it does, at least,
> > > reclaim resources in use by defunct organizations that are no longer
> > > paying the maintenance for them.
Yes, but what about the (dozens, hundreds?) of entities that are
hoarding (and renewing) ASNs? These unused resources are gone forever
- since they are seen as a scarce resource, they are kept artificially
alive (even though the orgs know full well there is neither a use nor
a justification for them).
//Alif
