[72775] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: SPF deployment by Oct. 1 ?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Mon Jul 26 16:05:15 2004
To: Gerald <gcoon@inch.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 26 Jul 2004 11:51:26 EDT."
<20040726114536.Q84008@kod.inch.com>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 15:52:42 -0400
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
--==_Exmh_633153444P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 11:51:26 EDT, Gerald said:
> I think this will be the next best thing in E-mail. I'd love for that date
> to be August 1 though.
OK... Aug 1 is a weekish away. Check your inbound mail for today, and ask
yourself how much you'd be losing if you started enforcing SPF today, and what
percentage of the sites you get legitimate mail from are likely to deploy SPF
tags this week.....
And then keep in mind that SPF is *known* to break certain types of mail
reflectors and forwarding (argue all you want about whether such things are
fundementally broken - they're still *in production use*)....
--==_Exmh_633153444P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQFBBWEJcC3lWbTT17ARAgkeAKDuCU3s2mqdK46ACASK+7WlGzKQxACgirgM
oB/LETDzIEBDEjJHW44FhTI=
=7LuG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_633153444P--
