home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 20:41:03 +0300 From: Petri Helenius <pete@he.iki.fi> To: Gerald <gcoon@inch.com> Cc: John Bittenbender <kisanth88@gmail.com>, nanog@nanog.org In-Reply-To: <20040726114536.Q84008@kod.inch.com> Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu Gerald wrote: > >Does it strike anyone else as odd that they would be encouraging the use, >but not have SPF setup yet for the primary domains they are known for yet? >AOL is leading the way by publishing their SPF records. I can understand >not implementing the blocks or delays yet, but publish the records ASAP. > > > It does, I´ve also been advocating for them to implement reverse maps for servers responsible for distributing updates so they could more easily be identified but to no avail. Pete >I think this will be the next best thing in E-mail. I'd love for that date >to be August 1 though. > >FYI SpamAssassin 3.0 has / will have SPF checks built in. > >Gerald > >
home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |