[72780] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: SPF deployment by Oct. 1 ?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (J.D. Falk)
Mon Jul 26 17:05:52 2004
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 14:05:17 -0700
From: "J.D. Falk" <jdfalk@cybernothing.org>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <20040726114536.Q84008@kod.inch.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On 07/26/04, Gerald <gcoon@inch.com> wrote:
> > http://www.infoworld.com/article/04/07/22/HNmicrosoftid_1.html
>
> Does it strike anyone else as odd that they would be encouraging the use,
> but not have SPF setup yet for the primary domains they are known for yet?
From that article: 'Sender ID is a proposed technology standard,
backed by Microsoft, for verifying an e-mail message's source. It
combines two previous standards: the Microsoft-developed "Caller
ID," and the Meng Weng Wong-developed SPF.'
Here's Hotmail's Caller ID record:
_ep.hotmail.com text = "<ep xmlns='http://ms.net/1' testing='true'><out><m><indirect>list1._ep.hotmail.com</indirect><indirect>list2._ep.hotmail.com</indirect><indirect>list3._ep.hotmail.com</indirect></m></out></ep>"
http://www.microsoft.com/mscorp/twc/privacy/spam_senderid.mspx
--
J.D. Falk "...one of the worst signs of our danger
<jdfalk@cybernothing.org> is we can't imagine the route
from here to utopia."
-- Kim Stanley Robinson
