[62774] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Windows updates and dial up users
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Mon Sep 22 11:03:45 2003
To: "Stephen J. Wilcox" <steve@telecomplete.co.uk>
Cc: Sean Donelan <sean@donelan.com>, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 22 Sep 2003 10:45:13 -0000."
<Pine.LNX.4.44.0309221042390.27145-100000@serv1.thn>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 11:00:51 -0400
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
--==_Exmh_777671402P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 10:45:13 -0000, "Stephen J. Wilcox" said:
> Ok then different idea, assuming that we're all agreed its MS's responsibility
> to ensure users are patched promptly and without extra cost to the end user.
You agree. I agree. Microsoft doesn't agree, and based on the fact that the user
presumably agreed to the EULA as phrased, the users don't either.
After all, if the users didn't like the current support, they're free to change vendors. ;)
--==_Exmh_777671402P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQE/bw6jcC3lWbTT17ARAjEIAKDcAoAPkdMXVDWO+w6RKiuBfeqwEwCgtk0m
rt0rUqFXf3cIE640iV8riPE=
=b+09
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_777671402P--
