[47650] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: ratios
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Wed May 8 12:08:05 2002
Message-Id: <200205081559.g48FxM7e002361@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
To: "E.B. Dreger" <eddy+public+spam@noc.everquick.net>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 08 May 2002 01:08:14 -0000."
<Pine.LNX.4.20.0205080045420.28808-100000@www.everquick.net>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_2090617444P";
micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Wed, 08 May 2002 11:59:22 -0400
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
--==_Exmh_2090617444P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Wed, 08 May 2002 01:08:14 -0000, "E.B. Dreger" said:
> I guess if one is trying to meet the traffic ratio, one could
> reroute certain traffic through an intermediary. Maybe some
> nets tried this, met the minimum/geo/ratio requirements, and
> there just _had_ to be another way to depeer?
I misread this as "minimum/ego/ratio", and suddenly it made a LOT more sense. ;)
--==_Exmh_2090617444P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQE82UtZcC3lWbTT17ARAisHAKCPU27jcwc8Gr2No0Efd2v+dLYcVACgozkA
DMapBtKXB8mCGPW2pYY/TYY=
=wvht
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_2090617444P--
