[47648] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: ratios
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (E.B. Dreger)
Wed May 8 12:01:36 2002
Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 16:00:13 +0000 (GMT)
From: "E.B. Dreger" <eddy+public+spam@noc.everquick.net>
To: Richard A Steenbergen <ras@e-gerbil.net>
Cc: "Stephen J. Wilcox" <steve@opaltelecom.co.uk>, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <20020508152111.GZ375@overlord.e-gerbil.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.20.0205081550310.8696-100000@www.everquick.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
RAS> Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 11:21:11 -0400
RAS> From: Richard A Steenbergen
RAS> If you take their statement at face value, that either don't
RAS> know how to use localpref, or they don't like path
RAS> redundancy. If you try to look for hidden meaning, you come
RAS> away thinking that they want you to be a tier 1, and just
RAS> couldn't find a better way to state it.
I find it hard to believe that they wouldn't grok local-pref.
Considering all the nice knobs that they provide... I'm sure they
have enough clue to give downstreams higher local-pref than peers
unless there's some special reason for otherwise.
--
Eddy
Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - EverQuick Internet Division
Phone: +1 (316) 794-8922 Wichita/(Inter)national
Phone: +1 (785) 865-5885 Lawrence
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 11:23:58 +0000 (GMT)
From: A Trap <blacklist@brics.com>
To: blacklist@brics.com
Subject: Please ignore this portion of my mail signature.
These last few lines are a trap for address-harvesting spambots.
Do NOT send mail to <blacklist@brics.com>, or you are likely to
be blocked.
