|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20011012072633.02d41178@timmins.net> Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 07:27:45 -0400 To: <bwalters@inet-direct.com> From: Paul Timmins <paul@timmins.net> Cc: nanog@merit.edu In-Reply-To: <EDEMIELNGNLKJOOGPGNPKEHACIAA.bwalters@inet-direct.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu Less than a week ago Cisco TAC recommended DRAM from the Approved Vendor List to me. I hope this is not true. -Paul At 06:16 AM 10/12/2001 -0500, you wrote: >Has anybody else received one of >these emails? I don't have an issue >related to this, but I am concerned that >this will drive up the costs of maintaining >and improving my infrastructure. > >-bradly > > > Going forward, Cisco no longer recommends > > the use in our networking products of memory > > products sold by third parties. Cisco has therefore > > discontinued the "Approved Vendor List" we have > > maintained in the past. In the event your company > > contacts Cisco with a support issue, and Cisco > > determines that the support issue you have reported > > is one that arises from your company's use of a third > > party memory product, Cisco may, in its discretion, > > refuse to provide technical assistance to help > > resolve the issue you have identified, whether > > such assistance would be provided under a product > > warranty or under a support plan such as SmartNet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |