[41035] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: multi-homing fixes
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Roeland Meyer)
Tue Aug 28 15:02:55 2001
Message-ID: <EA9368A5B1010140ADBF534E4D32C728069E50@condor.mhsc.com>
From: Roeland Meyer <rmeyer@mhsc.com>
To: 'John Fraizer' <nanog@Overkill.EnterZone.Net>,
Mark Radabaugh <mark@amplex.net>
Cc: Leo Bicknell <bicknell@ufp.org>, nanog@merit.edu
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 12:04:15 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
|> From: John Fraizer [mailto:nanog@Overkill.EnterZone.Net]
|> Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 11:56 AM
|>
|> > Multihomed customers generate LESS technical support rather than
|> > more? Maybe we should urge more people to multihome...
|>
|> "Multihomed customers generate LESS technical support rather than
|> more?" Perhaps in an outage instance they do. When they
|> have a routing
|> issue, it can become a finger-pointing match between their
|> upstreams and
|> thus, it generates 100% more technical support for the upstream who
|> doesn't have the problem.
only until the mal-functioning provider is replaced.
