[39048] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Cable Modem [really PPPoE is inferior]
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Dee McKinney)
Mon Jun 25 22:22:12 2001
From: Dee McKinney <deem@wdm.com>
Message-Id: <200106260223.f5Q2NJF14028@papa.wdm.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 18:23:14 -0800 (AKDT)
To: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <200106252053.f5PKrRt11181@smtp.gwi.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Fletcher E Kittredge <fkittred@gwi.net> wrote:
>
>
> Personally, I think PPPoE belongs in the "bad idea box" along with
> IPoATM and MPLS.
IPoATM for sure, but MPLS also ? I have my thoughts similiar to MPLS
but until I get my Sycamore boxes up and running, I don't know how bad
it will be. Under CISCO it has limitations for sure.
/Dee
