[39047] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: SBC forcing new contract on ISPs
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Dee McKinney)
Mon Jun 25 22:18:45 2001
From: Dee McKinney <deem@wdm.com>
Message-Id: <200106260221.f5Q2Llg13995@papa.wdm.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 18:20:27 -0800 (AKDT)
To: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <p0510100eb75d3879e89b@[216.145.52.64]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Derek Balling <dredd@megacity.org> wrote:
>
> you've obviously never dealt with the California PUC.
>
> A more useless group more firmly in the pockets of the utilities
> themselves I have never seen.
I've never dealt with the California PUC yet....but in Alaska, it's
called the RCA, for Regulatory Commision of Alaska, and has challenged
the term "clueless". I'm wondering if there are any PUC commision members
with any real understanding ?
/Dee
