[39044] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Cable Modem [really PPPoE is inferior]
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Timothy R. McKee)
Mon Jun 25 20:55:07 2001
From: "Timothy R. McKee" <trm3@nuvox.net>
To: "North America Network Operators Group Mailing List" <nanog@merit.edu>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 20:55:34 -0400
Message-ID: <KNEDLIFDCBNLILNDBEMDEEIHEAAA.trm3@nuvox.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <200106252122.f5PLMIt17456@smtp.gwi.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
We worked with PPPoE for a while. None of the Windows implementations work
well. They are terrible. We ended up requiring all customers to buy a dual
Ethernet router that supported it. That works a little better.
Tim McKee
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nanog@merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu]On Behalf Of
Fletcher E Kittredge
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 17:22
To: Pim van Riezen
Cc: North America Network Operators Group Mailing List; Ted Lemon
Subject: Re: Cable Modem [really PPPoE is inferior]
On Mon, 25 Jun 2001 23:00:02 +0200 Pim van Riezen wrote:
>
> Pick two?
>
> Pi
My point exactly. It is time for those who have to pick two to get
out of the game.
thank you,
fletcher
--
Fletcher Kittredge
Great Works Internet
8 Pomerleau St.
Biddeford, Maine
