[35438] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Scott Gifford)
Thu Mar 8 20:24:19 2001
To: William Allen Simpson <wsimpson@greendragon.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
From: Scott Gifford <sgifford@tir.com>
Date: 08 Mar 2001 19:48:46 -0500
In-Reply-To: William Allen Simpson's message of "Wed, 07 Mar 2001 17:01:24 -0500"
Message-ID: <m31ys7vkb5.fsf@sghome.tir.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
> Another stated rationale is that ICANN UDRP is "flawed". I'm not sure
> how adding pirate domains improves the UDRP. The pirate has publically
> stated that it will follow the UDRP.
>
> Several folks suggested examples of "reverse-hijacked" domain
> decisions. I've taken a bit of time to look at the most frequently
> cited. Here's two that are exemplar:
[ ... ]
We've probably strayed way off-topic, but I think that it speaks
volumes about how well the UDRP works that research had to be done to
find two cases where it made a reasonable ruling.
-------ScottG.
