[35437] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Namespaces (was: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play)

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Scott Gifford)
Thu Mar 8 20:17:18 2001

To: Joshua Goodall <joshua@roughtrade.net>
Cc: <nanog@merit.edu>
From: Scott Gifford <sgifford@tir.com>
Date: 08 Mar 2001 19:54:42 -0500
In-Reply-To: Joshua Goodall's message of "Thu, 8 Mar 2001 10:21:07 +0100 (CET)"
Message-ID: <m3wv9zu5gt.fsf@sghome.tir.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu


Joshua Goodall <joshua@roughtrade.net> writes:

[ ... ]

> A better method for addressing data would be based on source-brokered,
> signed, distributed caches of keywords that can be search and, more
> importantly, bookmarked in the context of each signer.

I'm not sure I want something that elaborate to ftp a file from my
laptop to my desktop.  And I certainly don't want to have to remember
IP addresses for both of them.

I think DNS works pretty well.  You just have to think of it like an
800 number --- 800 numbers are ambiguous (1-800-CONTACTS could provide
information about how to contact people, information about aliens
contacting the earth, or information about the old PBS show 3-2-1
Contact!, but it in fact sells contact lenses), but they're still
easier to remember than the digits.

------ScottG.


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post