[32764] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Alter.net and Verio peering in Sacramento?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Alex Bligh)
Mon Dec 11 17:29:21 2000
From: Alex Bligh <amb@gxn.net>
To: John Fraizer <nanog@EnterZone.Net>
Cc: "Christopher L. Morrow" <cmorrow@UU.NET>,
Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>, Mathew Butler <mbutler@tonbu.com>,
"'nanog@merit.edu'" <nanog@merit.edu>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 11 Dec 2000 17:02:44 EST."
<Pine.LNX.4.21.0012111701400.13699-100000@Overkill.EnterZone.Net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 22:20:30 +0000
Message-Id: <E145bJ8-0001nC-00@sapphire.noc.gxn.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
nanog@EnterZone.Net said:
> Alternatively, you could expect that the carrier might notice themself
> that there is a problem.
May be their NOCs did, (unless they were too busy reading NANOG of
course). Without calling them it would be difficult to tell.
Meanwhile the few of us on this list in neither NOC can pontificate
about it which will no doubt be of great assistance to them in
resolving the issue at hand.
Sarcasm aside: If people posted 'Verio<->Sprint peering problems,
Verio Ticket number nnnnn, Sprint ticket number nnnnn, apparent
latency problems between west coast customers caused by peering
congestion in Seattle' or whatever (not that I'm saying this
is what the problem is here), this would no doubt be treated as
an informative post (just like when Sean tells us about fiber
cuts). If, on the other hand, nanog is used as an alternative
to noc@ or your regular support channel, the s/n ratio here will get
even worse.
--
Alex Bligh
VP Core Network, XO Communications - http://www.xo.com/
(formerly Nextlink Inc, Concentric Network Corporation
GX Networks, Xara Networks)
