[32392] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: ISPs as content-police or method-police
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Shawn McMahon)
Mon Nov 20 22:24:01 2000
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2000 22:21:13 -0500
From: Shawn McMahon <smcmahon@eiv.com>
To: nanog@merit.edu
Message-ID: <20001120222113.A6799@eiv.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="wac7ysb48OaltWcw"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <NEBBJKIJGLMGELMBGHEOGEOOCCAA.ck@arch.bellsouth.net>; from ck@arch.bellsouth.net on Mon, Nov 20, 2000 at 12:03:57PM -0500
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
--wac7ysb48OaltWcw
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Mon, Nov 20, 2000 at 12:03:57PM -0500, Christian Kuhtz wrote:
>=20
> What doesn't make sense in that argument is why you couldn't just simply
> upsell the customer to a managed fw solution etc if that's the concern.
> Educate them, and let them decide based on the education they received.
Because it doesn't just affect them; it affects you, your customers,
and your business.
> I wouldn't be so sure, particularly because of the legal exposure...
Does anybody have a live example of this supposed legal exposure, to
counter all the many examples those of us who don't believe in it have
given?
--wac7ysb48OaltWcw
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE6GeopEcl9bQ0RMt0RAjR3AJ9g1xworLYVtbWRiZRz9iLD4xj+2QCgv9P5
cQlRXqisOcTY6ooA2UHhajQ=
=J00x
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--wac7ysb48OaltWcw--
