[32393] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: ISPs as content-police or method-police
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Shawn McMahon)
Mon Nov 20 22:51:53 2000
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2000 22:49:57 -0500
From: Shawn McMahon <smcmahon@eiv.com>
To: nanog@merit.edu
Message-ID: <20001120224957.B6799@eiv.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Fba/0zbH8Xs+Fj9o"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <47FE39302BF73B4C93BC84B87341282C1F18@condor.lvrmr.mhsc.com>; from rmeyer@mhsc.com on Mon, Nov 20, 2000 at 01:16:00PM -0800
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
--Fba/0zbH8Xs+Fj9o
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Mon, Nov 20, 2000 at 01:16:00PM -0800, Roeland Meyer wrote:
>=20
> problems with it. But, they will never get my business and I will never s=
ign
> such a contract unless there is no competitor with a different policy. In
> the latter case, my next stop would be my attorney, regarding a restraint=
of
> trade suit.
Then he'll send a letter, and they'll open the port, just like they
would have if you'd emailed them.
Only he'll charge you a couple of hundred dollars for it.
Ooooooo, what a smart businessman you are.
--Fba/0zbH8Xs+Fj9o
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE6GfDlEcl9bQ0RMt0RAm6RAKD45ykXg/8vR0Cdsax4MSgu0MjhcACffFOe
L82VIzdLnJNsYqVSR2hOm2s=
=R7YZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Fba/0zbH8Xs+Fj9o--
