|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
From: jon@branch.com (Jon Zeeff) To: salo@msc.edu (Tim Salo) Date: Wed, 19 Jun 1996 14:47:19 -0400 (EDT) Cc: dorian@cic.net, nanog@merit.edu In-Reply-To: <199606191544.KAA20694@uh.msc.edu> from "Tim Salo" at Jun 19, 96 10:44:57 am > > In a similar vein, something to think about: > > > > IP packet size distribution (970780293 total packets): > > 1-32 64 96 128 160 192 224 256 288 320 352 384 416 448 480 > > .000 .497 .094 .013 .009 .006 .007 .010 .010 .014 .004 .005 .002 .002 .002 > > ^^^^ > > 512 544 576 1024 1536 2048 2560 3072 3584 4096 4608 > > .004 .002 .189 .000 .069 .053 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 Ah, finally some data pertaining to the "it's really important that interconnects support large mtus" discussion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |