[3197] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: tilting at windmills discussion 2
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Dorian Kim)
Wed Jun 19 03:34:18 1996
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 1996 03:29:34 -0400 (EDT)
From: Dorian Kim <dorian@cic.net>
To: Jerry Scharf <scharf@vix.com>
cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <199606190624.XAA27638@gw.home.vix.com>
On Tue, 18 Jun 1996, Jerry Scharf wrote:
> the overhead for various framing methods. Hopefully taking
> empirical data from the internet and giving people code will reduce
> the discussions of what the "cell tax" for real traffic is. Don't
> like my traffic, collect your own. Fighting over conclusions will
> be left to others.
In a similar vein, something to think about:
IP packet size distribution (970780293 total packets):
1-32 64 96 128 160 192 224 256 288 320 352 384 416 448 480
.000 .497 .094 .013 .009 .006 .007 .010 .010 .014 .004 .005 .002 .002 .002
^^^^
512 544 576 1024 1536 2048 2560 3072 3584 4096 4608
.004 .002 .189 .000 .069 .053 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000
Collected at a private interconnect between CICNet, OARnet and OSU. over a
period of a week or so.
-dorian
