[3201] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: tilting at windmills discussion 2
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Justin W. Newton)
Wed Jun 19 12:50:04 1996
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 1996 12:48:28 -0400
To: nanog@merit.edu
From: "Justin W. Newton" <justin@erols.com>
Do you also happen to have a breakdown of what ports this raffic was going
to/from? The reason I ask iss that this seems to lead to a conclusion that
a lot of the data was for "interactive" services such as telnet and the like
as opposed to batch transfer type of connections such as ftp, and sendmail.
At 03:29 AM 6/19/96 -0400, Dorian Kim wrote:
>On Tue, 18 Jun 1996, Jerry Scharf wrote:
>
>> the overhead for various framing methods. Hopefully taking
>> empirical data from the internet and giving people code will reduce
>> the discussions of what the "cell tax" for real traffic is. Don't
>> like my traffic, collect your own. Fighting over conclusions will
>> be left to others.
>
>In a similar vein, something to think about:
>
>IP packet size distribution (970780293 total packets):
> 1-32 64 96 128 160 192 224 256 288 320 352 384 416 448 480
> .000 .497 .094 .013 .009 .006 .007 .010 .010 .014 .004 .005 .002 .002 .002
> ^^^^
> 512 544 576 1024 1536 2048 2560 3072 3584 4096 4608
> .004 .002 .189 .000 .069 .053 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000
>
>Collected at a private interconnect between CICNet, OARnet and OSU. over a
>period of a week or so.
>
>-dorian
>
>
>
Justin Newton
Internet Architect
Erol's Internet Services
