[31740] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Anyone heard anything Good or Bad about Juniper equipment ?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Dave Curado)
Sat Oct 14 18:36:19 2000
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2000 18:34:25 -0400
From: Dave Curado <davec@weezel.net>
To: "Daniel L. Golding" <dan@netrail.net>
Cc: Vijay Gill <vijay@umbc.edu>,
"Mr. James W. Laferriere" <babydr@baby-dragons.com>, nanog@merit.edu
Message-ID: <20001014183425.A18211@weezel.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10010141152300.3189-100000@outage.netrail.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
> Stay away from the OSPF. 9 out of 10 engineers agree: If you use Juniper,
> use ISIS. Or become very good at troubleshooting OSPF.
I must be that tenth engineer. We've had no ospf problems.
> > > Hello All , Replying off list would be best & I can summarize if
> > > anyone has interest . Have my eye's on acquiring a couple of
> > > their larger units . I Just need some feedback from -real- users .
> >
> > I have worked for two very large providers with juniper equipment. Like
> > all equipment, they have their flaws but they are so much better than the
> > next closes vendor that its not even funny.
> >
> > Much better response from engineers, much better code, much higher density
> > per rack, and their line cards actually can do oc192
> >
> > /vijay
> >
> >
> >
>
