[31739] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Anyone heard anything Good or Bad about Juniper equipment ?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Daniel L. Golding)
Sat Oct 14 11:59:18 2000
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2000 11:53:15 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Daniel L. Golding" <dan@netrail.net>
To: Vijay Gill <vijay@umbc.edu>
Cc: "Mr. James W. Laferriere" <babydr@baby-dragons.com>,
nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SGI.4.21L.01.0010131754480.3063589-100000@irix1.gl.umbc.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10010141152300.3189-100000@outage.netrail.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Stay away from the OSPF. 9 out of 10 engineers agree: If you use Juniper,
use ISIS. Or become very good at troubleshooting OSPF.
- Dan Golding
On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Vijay Gill wrote:
>
> On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Mr. James W. Laferriere wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Hello All , Replying off list would be best & I can summarize if
> > anyone has interest . Have my eye's on acquiring a couple of
> > their larger units . I Just need some feedback from -real- users .
>
> I have worked for two very large providers with juniper equipment. Like
> all equipment, they have their flaws but they are so much better than the
> next closes vendor that its not even funny.
>
> Much better response from engineers, much better code, much higher density
> per rack, and their line cards actually can do oc192
>
> /vijay
>
>
>
