[31744] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Anyone heard anything Good or Bad about Juniper equipment ?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Josh Richards)
Mon Oct 16 00:26:22 2000
Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2000 20:54:52 -0700
From: Josh Richards <jrichard@cubicle.net>
To: nanog@merit.edu
Message-ID: <20001015205452.A7691@datahaven.freedom.gen.ca.us>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="x+6KMIRAuhnl3hBn"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0010131404350.2908-100000@filesrv1.baby-dragons.com>; from babydr@baby-dragons.com on Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 02:19:10PM -0700
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
--x+6KMIRAuhnl3hBn
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
* Mr. James W. Laferriere <babydr@baby-dragons.com> [20001013 13:53]:
>=20
> Hello All , Replying off list would be best & I can summarize if
> anyone has interest . Have my eye's on acquiring a couple of
> their larger units . I Just need some feedback from -real- users .
May want to ask on the Juniper list: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
I've been searching for much the same info as you.
-jr
----
Josh Richards [JTR38/JR539-ARIN]
<jrichard@geekresearch.com/cubicle.net/fix.net/freedom.gen.ca.us>
Geek Research LLC - <URL:http://www.geekresearch.com/>
IP Network Engineering and Consulting
--x+6KMIRAuhnl3hBn
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iEYEARECAAYFAjnqe+wACgkQ8VgqD3XNPNUBQgCgnjsg55T/mBDra34QaBGjRDdx
zMQAmQGRgylWm+f3NhjPwZEfD4Cy9XbL
=mF0/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--x+6KMIRAuhnl3hBn--
