[31056] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: When IPv6 ... if ever?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Masataka Ohta)
Thu Sep 7 18:18:51 2000
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Message-Id: <200009072203.HAA27869@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0009070606320.31180-100000@intrepid.vapour.net> from
batz at "Sep 7, 2000 06:10:25 am"
To: batz <batsy@vapour.net>
Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2000 07:03:42 +0859 ()
Cc: smd@clock.org, nanog@merit.edu, nathan@terminus.com,
rmeyer@MHSC.com
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Batz;
> Has there been any studies done on IPv6 as an alternative to NAT?
>
> Besides IPSec, dynamic addressing, authentication and improved
> security, are there other benefits to deploying IPv6 instead of
> NAT?
Are you saying that there has been some studies done on IPv6 that it
does offer dynamic addressing, authentication and improved security?
Where can I find it?
Masataka Ohta
