[31047] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: When IPv6 ... if ever?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (batz)
Thu Sep 7 10:56:40 2000
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2000 06:10:25 -0400 (EDT)
From: batz <batsy@vapour.net>
To: smd@clock.org
Cc: nanog@merit.edu, nathan@terminus.com, rmeyer@MHSC.com
In-Reply-To: <20000902174042Z6809-16180+8@cesium.clock.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0009070606320.31180-100000@intrepid.vapour.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Sat, 2 Sep 2000 smd@clock.org wrote:
:Ask yourself, as an ISP, how much more you are willing to pay your
:transit providers for IPv4 + IPv6 transit, and how you are going
:to get the money for that and for the deployment/retraining costs.
:
:Then ask yourself, as an ISP, what benefit you get from IPv6.
:
:My answers: not a chance, none, and zero, respectively.
:
Has there been any studies done on IPv6 as an alternative to NAT?
Besides IPSec, dynamic addressing, authentication and improved
security, are there other benefits to deploying IPv6 instead of
NAT?
--
batz
Chief Reverse Engineer
Superficial Intelligence Research
Defective Technologies
